Despite the new name and a few useful new features, Sierra is very much representative of the iterative updates we've come to expect from Apple.Sierra has to have been one of the best recent major versions of macOS. OS X is dead, long live macOS. At 2016's Worldwide Developers Conference, Apple didn't just announce a new version of the operating system that powers its computers, but a whole new identity.
![]() Whats New Sierra Upgrade It ToIf your Mac’s more than about seven years old, you’re probably not going to be able to upgrade it to Mojave, but at best will be stuck with High Sierra or earlier. Now’s the time to decide what you do next.One fundamental determinant is your Mac model and its hardware capabilities. From this autumn/fall, you’re on your own, and any vulnerabilities which remain in Sierra and its bundled apps will be left unfixed, as they are for all previous versions of macOS. If you’re still running Sierra, the release of Catalina is expected to affect you greatly: if Apple sticks to its longstanding policy, that marks the end of security fixes and support for macOS 10.12.The newer version of APFS not only supports Fusion Drives, but is significantly better in many respects, and it’s disappointing that Apple hasn’t seen fit to update the version in High Sierra. If you want to upgrade to either High Sierra or Mojave, you’ll be best replacing old internal storage with a decent-sized SSD, ideally 500 GB or more.If you have a choice, for many users Mojave has proved a significant step forward from High Sierra. Although some users have managed to get Mojave to boot from HFS+, your boot drive should normally be in APFS format, and that again probably isn’t wise for an ageing hard disk or Fusion Drive. If your Mac is still booting from its original internal hard disk or Fusion Drive, then upgrading to High Sierra or Mojave might not be good news anyway, because of APFS.In High Sierra, APFS doesn’t run on Fusion Drives, and shouldn’t be your choice for hard disks either. ![]() ![]() This also lets me run Office 2001 with its blazing fast startup time and without the direct wires connected to Microsoft servers. So long as Xcode supports it, so will I support Sierra.After several problems with AFP-performance and incompatible PlugIns for Apple Mail I refused to update and am still very happy with Sierra. I still have many apps which run on El Capitan, and don’t plan to alter support in the great majority of my free apps, which generally run fine on Sierra. SmallCubed for instance wants me to buy and install the complete MailSuite now with MailTags, Mail Perspectives, SigPro and Mail Act-On (the latter one is the only bundle I respect as being useful). The UI has been changed from High Sierra on and it is not possible to see the path to the mailbox in the titlebar of a mail-window anymore (Apple decided to ditch this feature and to go for a “clean look” of the titlebar – I mean, who really should care about the location of the mail and the mailbox you are dealing with?) Some very useful PlugIns for Mail (like MailActOn, ReplyWithHeader and UniversalMailer) are not easy to maintain in High Sierra (let alone Mojave) anymore. Later Office versions seem to keep track of every document I work with, they force the system to download a bunch of crap (fonts and stationery I will never use) in the background (unless you set some folders in the Containers directory to “locked”) and the font management with these Office Versions is also a nightmare.The main reason I am staying with Sierra is Apple Mail. I am feeling not unconfortable to run a dedicated application for that and I also like the “Save As …” method. I can also live very good without the new view settings in the Finder and I don’t need the possibility to change some documents directly in the Finder. I do not need to make phonecalls with my Mac, I like the ease of a well maintained Music Library, I need no Dark Mode and a colour-changing Desktop Picture. Apple wants you to work with Sierra and Kaby Lake as the top CPU for that macOS. Sierra on a 6-core or 9-core CPU is a screaming performer (its almost like having back 10.6 or 10.9 regarding the overall performance – you remember?).This is the fact I wanted to highlight: Apple does not allow you to stay with the tool you feel absolutely comfortable with (in my case: macOS Sierra) if you want to upgrade your hardware. Sierra runs circles around High Sierra, Mojave and (so far) Catalina. Apple is forcing anyone to upgrade macOS for every new CPU generation.You should see with your own eyes the *real potential* of Sierra on Coffee Lake (which Apple does *not allow* Sierra to run with)! All you have to do for this is selecting a genuine (so called “Vanilla Installation”) of a macOS Sierra bootable drive in the BIOS of an ITX board with a Z370 or Z390 chipset. Free youtube downloader for mac wondershareNot just alone for the fun of it. And I probably will make Sierra run on Comet Lake. Can you imagine the fun with Sierra, High Sierra and Mojave on upcoming CPU generations? Along with all the compatibility? I can. Comet Lake is lurking around the corner and I doubt that any future Mac with a Comet Lake CPU will allow you to install Mojave on that anymore.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorRocio ArchivesCategories |